Rental fraud is on the rise, with nearly 75% of apartment owners seeing a big jump in fake applications last year. This was reported by Fox Business. In some areas, about half of all applications were found to be fraudulent.
This increase in fraudulent activity has caused higher eviction costs and rising rents across the U.S. housing market. The financial impact grows worse because of delays in evictions and laws that protect tenants, allowing fraudsters to remain in properties longer while property owners and managers struggle to address the situation.
Key Takeaways
"What's often overlooked in discussions about rental fraud is how it fundamentally changes the economics of being a housing provider. When we calculate that a single fraudulent tenant can cost upwards of $20,000, we're not just talking about lost rent—we're talking about resources that could have funded property improvements, kept rents stable for good tenants, or expanded housing availability. This ripple effect means rental fraud isn't just a landlord problem—it's a community problem that ultimately restricts housing supply and drives up costs for everyone in the rental ecosystem. The most effective property managers today are those who view fraud prevention not as an expense but as an investment in community stability."
Taylor Wilson, CEO of Rent with Clara
In 2025, rental application fraud has become increasingly sophisticated across the multifamily industry. Scammers use advanced techniques to bypass traditional verification methods, securing rental properties through deceptive means.
The real estate industry has seen fraudsters employ everything from forged documents to AI-generated profiles that appear legitimate to untrained eyes.
Identity fraud remains one of the most prevalent forms of deception in rental applications. Scammers forge pay stubs to inflate their income, create fake employment letters, and even generate convincing bank statements to deceive landlords.
Some fraudsters go further by creating entirely fabricated social security numbers and criminal background records, or they may attempt to sublet properties they've obtained through fraudulent means to unauthorized occupants.
According to a survey by TurboTenant, almost 75% of apartment owners experienced fraud in the past year, highlighting the widespread nature of apartment rent fraud. The NMHC (National Multifamily Housing Council) has also documented this alarming trend among leading apartment owners, developers and managers.
Fraudsters increasingly target multiple properties simultaneously using different fake identities, making it harder for individual landlords to identify patterns and deter fraudulent applications.
Here are some trends in fake rental applications:
Knowing these trends and types of rental fraud helps landlords protect themselves from losses.
Apartment rent fraud costs landlords far more than just unpaid rent. The total fraud costs include direct financial losses, property damage, and extensive legal expenses that can cripple a rental business.
Understanding the cost of rental fraud is essential for protecting your portfolio and maintaining healthy occupancy rates.
Unpaid rent represents just the beginning of financial losses from fraudulent tenants. Landlords lose income during vacancy periods, spend resources finding replacement tenants, and often write off thousands in uncollected rent.
The impact of rental fraud extends beyond individual properties, affecting overall portfolio performance and cash flow stability.
A report by the National Multifamily Housing Council shows rental housing fraud is getting worse, hurting landlords' finances.
Direct financial losses can be huge. Landlords need to think about these costs when figuring out the full effect of rental fraud.
Fraudulent tenants often leave behind significant damage to appliances, fixtures, flooring, and walls. These repairs not only drain financial resources but also extend vacancy periods, compounding losses.
Property damage from bad tenants can include hidden issues that don't surface immediately, leading to unexpected costs months after the fraudulent tenant has left.
This can include:
The cost of repairs includes the direct cost of fixing damages and the time and resources spent on the repair process.
The American Apartment Owners Association notes that dealing with fraudulent tenants typically requires legal action, including costly eviction proceedings. Attorney fees, court costs, and administrative time add substantial expenses to the already mounting losses from rental fraud.
These legal battles can drag on for months, particularly when fraudsters exploit tenant protection laws to delay the inevitable.
"The American Apartment Owners Association reported that if a landlord discovers false information on a rental application after a tenant has signed a lease, the tenant may be subject to eviction."
Legal and administrative costs include:
Landlords need to be ready for these extra costs when facing rental fraud.
The eviction process drains both time and money that could otherwise improve properties or attract quality tenants. Senior vice president Eric Taylor of TurboTenant notes that fraud has created a ripple effect of higher eviction rates across the industry.
The eviction timeline varies significantly based on location and case specifics, typically ranging from several weeks to several months. Filing and serving notice takes 1-5 days, court hearings occur within 1-3 weeks, judgment and warrant issuance requires 1-2 weeks, and physical eviction takes another 1-2 weeks.
These delays allow fraudulent tenants to remain in properties while landlords hemorrhage money.
On average, it can take from a few weeks to several months.
The costs of eviction can add up quickly. Here's a breakdown of typical expenses:
Eric Taylor, lead for trust and safety at TurboTenant, said fraud has led to higher eviction rates and rents. It also causes financial losses that affect the whole rental market.
Knowing these costs and timelines helps landlords get ready for the challenges of evicting a fraudulent tenant.
Understanding eviction costs helps landlords appreciate why proactive fraud prevention systems are far more cost-effective than reactive measures.
Beyond direct financial losses, the cost of rental fraud creates hidden expenses that significantly impact long-term profitability and property management sustainability. These overlooked costs can be just as damaging as unpaid rent.
A single fraudulent tenant can disrupt an entire community by causing disturbances, damaging common areas, or engaging in illegal activities. Good tenants may choose to leave rather than deal with the chaos, forcing landlords to find replacements at considerable expense. This turnover damages community stability and increases marketing costs.
Properties with a reputation for problem tenants struggle to attract quality renters, leading to decreased property values and rental income. Neglected or damaged units make the entire building less appealing to prospective tenants.
Over time, this depreciation can significantly impact your portfolio's overall value and marketability.
The stress of dealing with rental fraud takes a significant emotional toll on landlords. Managing evictions, repairing property damage, and navigating legal proceedings can be mentally exhausting.
The feeling of being deceived erodes trust and makes it difficult to maintain a positive, professional approach to property management.
Managing fraud risk becomes exponentially more complex in large apartment complexes where verification processes must scale across numerous units. The multifamily industry faces unique challenges that require proactive and comprehensive fraud prevention systems.
Multifamily properties present attractive targets for fraudsters due to the volume of applications processed. RealPage research indicates that areas with high rental demand see particularly elevated fraud rates.
Property owners and managers must implement robust screening process protocols that include thorough credit checks, employment verification, and criminal background reviews to vet applicants effectively. Looking for red flags such as inconsistent information or reluctance to provide documentation can help identify potential fraud before lease signing.
Key areas of concern include:
To fight these risks, managers need to have strong screening and watch for fraud signs.
A single fraudulent tenant can trigger a cascade of problems throughout a building, affecting legitimate tenants and overall property performance. Beyond property damage and legal fees, one bad tenant can decrease overall tenant satisfaction and harm the property's reputation.
By knowing these risks and acting early, managers can protect their investments. They can also keep their tenants happy and safe.
This real-world analysis demonstrates the devastating financial impact one fraudulent tenant can have on a landlord's bottom line. Understanding the true cost of rental fraud helps landlords appreciate the value of investing in comprehensive tenant screening upfront.
The total losses from a single fraudulent tenant reached $20,500 over twelve months. This included $12,000 in unpaid rent, $3,000 in property damage, $2,500 in legal fees for eviction, $2,000 in lost income during the eviction process, and $1,000 in screening and advertising costs for a new tenant. This breakdown illustrates why robust fraud prevention systems are essential investments rather than optional expenses.
Detailed Financial Losses:
The cost of rental fraud doesn't have to devastate your rental business. By implementing the right fraud prevention systems and understanding warning signs early, you can protect your portfolio from these devastating losses.
Avoid these costly mistakes. Download our free Fraud Prevention Guide to safeguard your property.
Our comprehensive guide includes:
The recovery process stretched across nine months, with filing for eviction taking one month, the eviction process requiring three months, legal proceedings for damages lasting six months, and recovery of unpaid rent extending to nine months.
The long-term consequences included severely impacted cash flow and the time-intensive process of rebuilding financial stability.
Key Steps in the Recovery Timeline:
This timeline demonstrates why proactive fraud prevention is far more cost-effective than reactive measures after fraud occurs. The emotional and financial toll of dealing with just one fraudulent tenant can take nearly a year to fully resolve, making prevention through proper tenant screening absolutely critical.
The cost of rental fraud remains a critical threat to landlords, with over 70% of major apartment landlords reporting increased fake rental applications in 2023. Protecting your investment requires implementing rigorous tenant screening processes that include verification of employment, income, credit checks, and criminal background reviews.
By ensuring applicants meet legitimate income requirements and carefully reviewing bank statements and other documentation, you can tighten your screening process to deter fraudsters.
Investing in comprehensive identity verification technology has become essential in today's rental market. Advanced fraud prevention systems can detect forged documents, fake social security numbers, and other signs of identity fraud that might slip past manual review.
The upfront investment in proper screening tools pays for itself many times over by preventing even a single fraudulent tenant from entering your property.
By staying informed and taking proactive measures, landlords can safeguard their investments and maintain healthy, profitable rental businesses in an increasingly challenging market.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
