Key Takeaways
This guide reflects close monitoring of New York's tenant screening fee framework and the overlapping protections that apply to renters and landlords statewide, including New York City.
New York reaches the same outcome as Colorado and Illinois — renters who provide their own screening documents avoid paying duplicate application fees — but through a different legal path. Rather than a dedicated portable tenant-screening report statute, New York's protection is embedded in a broader application-fee cap law passed in 2019. The result for renters is functionally identical to a mandatory PTSR state: provide a recent background and credit check, pay nothing for the screening. The legal architecture behind it, and what that means for enforcement, is worth understanding clearly.
Real Property Law § 238-a(1)(b), added by the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019, establishes two rules that operate together.
The first is a fee cap. Landlords across New York State cannot charge an application fee that exceeds the actual cost of a background check and credit check, or $20, whichever is less. If a landlord uses a $15 screening service, the maximum fee is $15. If they use a $30 service, the fee is still capped at $20. The cap applies statewide, to every residential rental, with no carve-out for small landlords.
The second rule functions like PTSR protection. If an applicant provides their own background check and credit check — completed within the previous 30 days — the landlord must waive the application fee entirely. No fee at all. Not the capped amount, not a processing charge, not an administrative fee by another name. The report exists, it is current, and the landlord cannot charge for it.
Any provision in a lease, application, or contract that purports to waive this protection is void. A landlord cannot ask a renter to sign away the right to provide their own screening documents as a condition of applying. The protection is not waivable by agreement — it exists regardless of what the paperwork says. Renters who want to understand how New York's approach compares to the dedicated PTSR frameworks in other states will find the portable tenant screening report state-by-state guide useful for the full picture.
The practical protection is similar across all three states: provide a recent report, avoid a fee. But the legal architecture matters, and it creates real differences in how the rules work.
Colorado and Illinois have dedicated PTSR statutes with specific conditions — the report must come from a consumer reporting agency, must be prepared at the applicant's expense, must be made available to the landlord at no cost, and must cover the landlord's stated screening criteria. Colorado's law adds a $2,500 damages floor and independent AG enforcement. Illinois's law has no statutory damages amount, but the same core mechanism.
New York's protection is broader in one sense — it applies to any applicant-provided background and credit check completed within 30 days, without specifying that it must come from a particular type of agency or be structured in a particular way. It is narrower in another sense — the statute concerns fee caps and fee waivers, not a portable report framework with formal content requirements. New York law does not specify what a compliant PTSR must contain, unlike Colorado law. It tells landlords what they cannot charge for.
For renters, the practical question is simpler than the legal distinction: get a comprehensive background and credit check from a reputable source within the past 30 days, and the landlord cannot charge you an application fee. For a plain-English breakdown of what each type of screening document covers, the comparison of a PTSR, a credit report, and a background check is worth reading before placing an order.
The fee waiver is mandatory when a renter provides their own background and credit check from within the prior 30 days — the landlord cannot charge a fee in that situation. But the law is structured around fee prohibition, not report acceptance. A landlord cannot charge a fee when a qualifying check is provided. Whether they can still require additional documentation at their own expense is a separate question that depends on the specifics of the tenancy and any applicable local rules.
New York City layers additional protections on top of state law, and several of them interact directly with the screening process.
The Fair Chance for Housing Act, which took effect in January 2024, restricts when and how NYC landlords can consider criminal history in rental decisions. Landlords cannot inquire about criminal history until after making a conditional offer of housing — and even then, can only consider specific categories of convictions under a defined weighing process. A renter providing a background check that includes criminal history is not giving the landlord permission to use that information however they choose. The Fair Chance rules govern what happens with it.
Source-of-income discrimination protections in NYC also interact with the screening process. Landlords cannot reject applicants — or apply different screening standards — based on the source of income, including Section 8 vouchers, disability benefits, or other legal sources of income. A landlord who uses a background or credit check to screen out voucher holders indirectly is operating in legally dangerous territory under both state and city law.
For renters applying in NYC specifically, understanding both layers — the state fee cap and the city-level protections — is part of knowing what landlords can and cannot ask for during the application process.
No. Under Real Property Law § 238-a(1)(b), if an applicant provides their own background and credit check completed within the prior 30 days, the landlord must waive the application fee entirely — not reduce it to $20, but waive it. Any agreement purporting to allow the landlord to charge anyway is void. The only scenario where a fee is permissible is when the applicant has not provided their own current screening documents.
The 30-day window is the critical variable. A background and credit check completed 31 days ago does not trigger the waiver. In a fast-moving New York City rental market — where competitive listings receive dozens of applications within hours — a report that is three weeks old when submitted is genuinely at risk of falling outside the window. Ordering fresh at the start of an active search, not before, is the practical approach.
The other variable is comprehensiveness. New York's statute does not specify what a qualifying check must contain, unlike Colorado's. However, a landlord can still argue that a credit-only or background-only report does not constitute the "background check and credit check" the law references. Ordering both components from the same consumer reporting agency in a single comprehensive report eliminates that ambiguity.
Renters who are unfamiliar with the terminology used in tenant screening documents — what a consumer reporting agency is, what FCRA compliance means, what an adverse action notice requires — will find the PTSR glossary useful before placing any order.
New York sits in the mandatory fee waiver tier alongside Colorado, Illinois, and Rhode Island — states where providing a qualifying screening document eliminates the application fee. The mechanism is different from Colorado's dedicated PTSR statute, but the outcome for renters is the same: a recent, comprehensive check from a reputable source means no duplicate fees.
The six other states with PTSR-related laws range from notification-conditional frameworks (Maryland, Washington) to fully voluntary opt-in (California). New York's 2019 protections predate most of them — the state was an early mover on application fee reform, even if it did not use the "portable tenant screening report" framing that later states adopted. For the full national breakdown, the PTSR state-by-state guide covers every state with an active law and explains where each one sits in the tier structure.
New York landlords who want to stay current on both state and city-level rules should monitor the New York State Senate's legislative activity directly — the 2019 package has been amended before, and the tenant-protection landscape in New York moves faster than in most states.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
